Wednesday, 20 June 2001 14:09

Patents for Second Medical Indications: Issues and Implications for Pharmacare in Canada

Written by  Teresa Scassa
Rate this item
(0 votes)

"Patents for Second Medical Indications:  Issues and Implications for Pharmacare in Canada", (2001) 9 Health Law Journal 23-59

This issue of second medical indication patents and their implications is an important one, as it has the potential to raise costs significantly for already cash-strapped provincial drug programs.  It may also have implications for privately funded drug plans, and hence for the cost of private drug insurance programs.  At the very least, it may impose costs on provincial health departments to defend themselves in any potential patent infringement actions taken against them.  It has also been argued that to list drugs as only partially interchangeable in provincial drug formularies will place difficult burdens on pharmacists and those who prescribe drugs, and may expose them directly to patent liability issues.  This paper considers both the issues raised by the decision in Apotex v. Ontario, and the implications for health departments, doctors and pharmacists.

Last modified on Thursday, 18 August 2011 11:32
Teresa Scassa

Latest from Teresa Scassa

Related items (by tag)

back to top